Using unique survey data on Dutch collective agreement negotiators, the authors model how information about other collective bargaining events influences the probability of negotiators encountering bargaining impasses or industrial action during collective bargaining. Competing hypotheses about this influence, derived from economic, social psychological and sociological approaches, are tested. The findings indicate that information about bargaining outcomes elsewhere has no significant effect on the occurrence of conflict. However, if the information content of spillover refers to the conflict potential in other bargaining events and the sources of information are proximate, the probability of conflict is increased. This suggests that sociological mechanisms offer a compelling alternative to those invoked in economics for explaining the relationship between spillover and conflict.
Thursday 11 December 2014
More recent news
- Fri 13 Jun 2025The UT Challenge 2025 Grand Finale: A Resounding Succes
- Thu 12 Jun 2025TechMed Magazine 2025 is out now!
- Tue 10 Jun 2025UT Challenge 2025 Grand Finale
- Thu 5 Jun 2025New seismometer system for real-time monitoring in the North Sea
- Mon 2 Jun 2025UT initiative 'CLEAR' nominated for Dutch Education Award