Using unique survey data on Dutch collective agreement negotiators, the authors model how information about other collective bargaining events influences the probability of negotiators encountering bargaining impasses or industrial action during collective bargaining. Competing hypotheses about this influence, derived from economic, social psychological and sociological approaches, are tested. The findings indicate that information about bargaining outcomes elsewhere has no significant effect on the occurrence of conflict. However, if the information content of spillover refers to the conflict potential in other bargaining events and the sources of information are proximate, the probability of conflict is increased. This suggests that sociological mechanisms offer a compelling alternative to those invoked in economics for explaining the relationship between spillover and conflict.
Thursday 11 December 2014
More recent news
- Wed 7 May 2025VR in addiction treatment for people with a mild intellectual disability
- Thu 1 May 2025Steering sound with light: a game-changer for integrated photonics
- Tue 29 Apr 2025Gerrit Brem: UT outpost in Zwolle
- Mon 28 Apr 2025The Professor de Winter award goes to Libera Fresiello
- Mon 28 Apr 2025Recap of the TechMed Research Day 2025