Go to the guides.
Overview of all questions in the application: A PDF of the questions in the web application (and the informational notes accompanying each question) is available here (e.g. for use when preparing the answers to the questions with your supervisor in advance).
NOTE: some questions are prefilled in order to show the complete functionalities of the webapplication, please ignore this.
From 10 December'18, new applications have to be submitted through the new web application (BMS Ethical Review). The old web application is not available anymore. If you need the pdf of an earlier request (numbered BCE....) or the approval email, get in contact with the ethical committee.
The BMS Ethics Committee assesses research with human subjects carried out by, or under supervision of, employees of the BMS Faculty only. Researchers from other faculties have to comply with the rules and procedures within their own faculty. If researchers from different faculties are involved in the same project, the human subjects research should be assessed by the faculty of the principal investigator.
Students from programs offered by other UT-faculties, in which BMS employees are involved as supervisors, should comply with the ethical regulations of their (first) supervisor’s faculty. This means that students from, for example, the Health Sciences program, should submit their project for ethical approval to the BMS Ethics committee only if their first supervisor is a BMS-employee.
In conclusion, BMS Ethics Committee reviews:
- BMS faculty bachelor/master program;
- If your supervisors are from one of the departments of BMS faculty and your educational program is not from BMS
- If your supervisors are from another faculty than BMS, but the educational program is from BMS
- Exception: if you make use of BMS LAB tools and you are from a TNW educational program with supervisors from TNW, then BMS Ethics Committee will ethically review your research as TNW does not have its own ethical review procedure yet.
Hence, if your Bachelor or Master is at the faculty EEMCS (EWI), ET or TNW, with supervisors of EWI/EEMCS or ET faculty and no supervisor from BMS is involved than you need to submit your research to EEMCS/EWI Ethics Committee or the Natural Sciences and Engineering Sciences Ethics Committee when you are from ET/TNW.
ITC staff and ATLAS students (if their supervisor is not from BMS) have to submit with ITC Ethics Committee.
- UT Students/employees with an s-/m-account are able to log in. Are you not registered as a regular bachelor/master UT student (eg, registered with Saxion and following a course here: you have an x-account) you cannot log in. If you participate with more students in a group, try if someone else can log in and submit the research for review.
- X-accounts cannot use the web application at this moment (this was also the case in the old web application).
- Try the link https://webapps.utwente.nl/ethicalreview/ in several web browsers (Chrome, Explorer, Safari). Also without a VPN-connection, you should be able to log in into the web application.
- Logout to every UT related website (for which your s-nr is needed) and then try to login in the BMS Ethical Review web application via the Ethics Committee website.
Let us know if you still experience problems, make print screens and tell us the date/time of the occurred error. If you have particularities in your employee appointment or student registration notify us. Then we can work on the problem and solve it.
Do not waste time, in the meantime, you can prepare your answers to the questions by using this document.
There are two answers here, depending on the status of your request:
1. You received questions on your submitted research request by either your supervisor or the reviewer.
Go to your request via the link in the email press the pencil button and 'edit questionnaire'. See also the submitter guide.
You can add a comment as a response to the questions raised by your supervisor/reviewer, but also change answers in your application form if needed. Always save your request and submit for review again (under section 8).
2. You want to make changes to your research request after it is ethically approved (ie. application completed).
Substantive changes (amendments) to the research proposal (eg., methods or design) after the ethical review has been completed, must be submitted to the ethical committee. Send your changes to firstname.lastname@example.org stating your request number and the changes. If needed, the changes will be presented to the involved reviewer and it will be decided if they are approved or if the changes are too substantial such that a new research request should be submitted.
In your overview 'my requests' in the column 'status' you can see where your request is in the application workflow. For example, if you made changes to your request and you did not submit your request again, it will still say 'waiting for researcher' and your request will be flagged red. If your request is with someone else in the workflow than your request is labeled blue.
Yes, you are allowed to answer in Dutch. However, make sure that your supervisor master the Dutch language, as your supervisor has a shared responsibility that the content of your request is correct. As he/she needs to approve your request before we assign it to one of our ethical reviewers.
The Ethics Committee of the BMS Faculty developed a guidance document for teachers who offer modules or courses in which students are trained in research. The document discusses relevant considerations and gives some advice on how teachers could safeguard ethical standards when students conduct research in the context of a module or course.
If you or your teaching staff have any questions about how to proceed in particular courses or modules, you can always contact the ethics contact person (under Contacts) of your department, or the BMS Ethics Committee via Lyan Kamphuis-Blikman: email@example.com
Because of the nation-wide Corona-measures your research request may take longer to ethically review. Once approved, please mind that the current restrictions on social and physical interaction regarding the COVID-19 outbreak may affect the execution of your study. Conducting research entails risks for both the researcher and the participant. This risk of becoming infected must be taken into account when considering whether a research project can be continued (e.g. with alternative digital means) or should be postponed.
Please also note that reservations for equipment and facilities of BMS Lab is closed: https://bmslab.utwente.nl/corona-measures/
The UT follows the advice and recommendations of the Dutch national government and keeps you updated via www.utwente.nl/corona
We provide you tips and advice on our BMS Intranet research-related Corona suggestions page.
Research staff and research students may face instances of lone working performing research activities. It is good to think about these risks and potential solutions. In all lone working situations, you do need to consider your own personal safety. It are situations in which you work without close or direct supervision or remote from colleagues. Possible lone working examples could be: Working in an individual-oriented research environment (e.g. laboratories), doing fieldwork, conducting interviews with participants in your own home or on the streets etc. Also, lone working situations could increase the risk of fabrication of research data or misinterpreting data. Potential solutions could be to keep your supervisor informed on the research details (e.g. with who/when do you conduct interviews) on a regular basis, and use good data management procedures/protection.