Regional sustainable development

SGD Wheel logo

Within the theme of regional sustainable development, CSTM focuses on the emerging interrelatedness between rural and urban areas in spatial, temporal, and sectoral perspectives. This links to the fact that cities occupy up to 60 times as much space outside their limits as within. Population growth, migration, and changes in lifestyles, preferences and consumption patterns confront us with extremely complex situations. Rivalry within and between regions can also easily lead to unwanted distributional effects and even exclusion.

Existing rurban challenges illustrate that balance is needed between market mechanisms and governance in the organization of sustainable social, technical and biophysical systems. We need to elaborate spatial and social implications of ‘rurbanization’ alike and assess and rethink institutions and governance in order to deal with contemporary challenges—and opportunities—in rurban settings. CSTM and other sections of the Department of Technology, Policy and Society team up in developing a Rurban innovations platform. Insights are needed upon the roles of 1) markets, bottom-up interactions and self-organization and 2) collective, multiscale and spatially relevant public and private decision-making, while dealing with the rural-urban interaction between technological innovation, society and the biophysical system in the contexts of sustainability, climate change and resilience.

CSTM’s emphasis is upon how contemporary innovations such as energy transition, evolving mobility and location patterns, climate adaptation, carbon sequestration, bio-circular economy, sustainable farming and food influence rurbanization, and how systems of rules that structure social and spatial organization (e.g., laws and regulations, policies, networks and boundary organizations, as well as values and preferences at multiple levels of human agency) can be improved.

In collaboration with regional stakeholders, practices, trends and impacts in diverse social and technological settings are evaluated and outlooks and improvements are developed. The knowledge from this socio-spatial sustainability analysis will feed novel educational programs, foresight exercises with stakeholders, as well as regional policy designs and programmes.

Key publications

Mohammadzadeh, L., Ghanian, M., Shadkam, S. , Özerol, G., & Marzban, A. (2021). Application of a land use change model to guide regional planning and development in the south basin of the Urmia Lake, IranEnvironmental earth sciences80(17), [545]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09837-7

Andriamihaja, O. R. , Metz, F., Zaehringer, J. G., Fischer, M., & Messerli, P. (2021). Identifying agents of change for sustainable land governanceLand use policy100, [104882]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104882

Özerol, G., Dolman, N., Bormann, H. , Bressers, H. , Lulofs, K., & Böge, M. (2020). Urban water management and climate change adaptation: A self-assessment study by seven midsize cities in the North Sea RegionSustainable Cities and Society55, [102066]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102066

Current projects

  • The role of informal practices in convivial post-growth rural lifestyles, 2019-2024

    Socio-economic precarity in Japan’s shrinking society has given rise to a range of alternative lifestyles that reject contemporary ideas of work and market dependency. One common feature of these “convivial” lifestyles are informal food practices (IFPs) and ways of food self-provisioning, such as gardening, wild food procurement, and food processing and sharing. Despite many modern-day pressures for them to disappear, IFPs continue to exist for a reason, but explanations as to why this is the case are lacking. This research will catalogue the range and diversity of IFPs performed as part of convivial lifestyles in rural communities popular with in-migrants as sites of experimentation with rural living. This will clarify how IFPs 1) contribute to peoples’ well-being and livelihoods as well as 2) inform and improve policy and planning related to IFPs to strengthen local food economies. Results will create a new research space on social practices, well-being, and food policy.

    More information

    Project information in KAKEN database: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-19K15931/

    Contact

  • Social system and policy towards regeneration of agri-food system from local perspectives in post-Corona era, 2021-2026

    Food and agriculture in Japan are caught between global issues such as global environmental problems and internal issues such as the consistent regression of domestic agricultural production. The recent coronavirus pandemic has made the future image even more uncertain. This comparative study regards the coronavirus pandemic as a turning point in the revitalization of the food and agriculture systems, and aims at embedding new policy ideas and frameworks in local policies as social institutions, while comprehensively mobilizing local socio-historical, comparative sociocultural, and socio-practical research methods to explore future social forms of linking food production and consumption.

    More information

    Project information in KAKEN database: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-21H04745/

    Contact

  • Interreg North Sea WaterWarmth (2023-2026)

    Project description 

    WaterWarmth aims to raise awareness about the potential of Aquathermal Energy (AE) as a renewable energy source for heating and cooling. This is important because it leads to: reduced carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions; decreased air pollution; generating ones’ own energy; and making more efficient use of energy and resources.

    We achieve this through collaboration with public, private and civic twenty partners across six work packages, ultimately aiming to provide the knowledge necessary for collective energy initiatives. These work packages include researching how to intelligently utilize the local energy system, scaling up, and facilitating regulations and permits.

    AE refers to the extraction, storage and distribution of heat from water. Within AE there are three different main sources to extract heat from: waste water, drinking water and surface water. With the help of a heat exchanger, warmth is extracted from a source and with the help of a heat pump this energy is used to bring water to an suitable temperature for heating and hot water supply. AE can also be used to cool buildings

    CSTM (Thomas Hoppe) is involved in Work package 6 which addresses governance and innovation of AE systems. This includes development and use of a theoretical framework for analyzing current governance arrangements, policy and stakeholder engagement, while working with selected use cases, where we study the governance and scaling of AE innovation, and how to support communities in reaping its benefits. Partners include: Province of Fryslân (lead partner), Lund University, TU Delft, several cities and energy cooperatives.

    Link for further information

    Project website: https://www.interregnorthsea.eu/waterwarmth

    Key publication

    Hoppe, T., Mohlakoana, N., Ness, B., & Brogaard, S. (2024). WP 6 Governance of collective energy systems:# 1 Framework and typology to analyse governance of current AE and other relevant heating systems. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379840761_WP_6_Governance_of_collective_energy_systems_1_Framework_and_typology_to_analyse_governance_of_current_AE_and_other_relevant_heating_systems

    Additional online material



    Contact


  • Connection Initiatives for Rural Communities, upscaling their Sustainable energy (CIRCUS) (2023-2027)

    The rural regions of Baden-Württemberg (DE), North Brabant and Gelderland (NL), Flanders (BE), Redon Agglomeration (FR), and Munster (IE) share a common challenge of achieving energy resilience and self-sufficiency. This is crucial for the overall EU energy transition and for addressing the specific energy supply issues faced by rural communities. These regions are located at the end of outdated electricity grids, making them vulnerable to energy shortages, especially with increasing electrification and limited capacity. Additionally, spatial constraints pose difficulties in selecting appropriate production systems.

    CIRCUS aims for the uptake of previously developed tools, shaping them in a transnational, accessible method. Implementation will occur in 6 rural communities in each country, leading to 30 more robust E-communities. 150 advisors will be trained in using the method.

    The project outputs benefit rural communities all over the NWE area, empowering rural citizens, entrepreneurs (farmers) and local authorities to collaborate to increase their energy efficiency, expanded local RE production, realized and managed within E-communities.

    Partners: Rural Association  (BE),  Innovation Support Centre for Agricultural and Rural Development (BE), Citizen energy in Pays de Vilaine (FR), Munster Technological University (IE), University of Twente (NL), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE),  Southern agricultural and horticultural organisation (NL), Active South Kerry Development Partnership (IE),  LochemEnergy Nederland (NL), Regional federation of citizen energy cooperatives (FR).

    More information

    Project website: circus.nweurope.eu 

    Contact

  • Combatting biodiversity loss and improving climate change resilience through evidence-based, integrated, and adaptive landscape governance in the Netherlands (COMBINED), 2024-2030

    Climate conditions, the state of nature, and human wellbeing are interconnected, and continuously changing. In COMBINED, we will combine climate, nature, and human interactions in landscapes including and combining grasslands, forests and urban nature. Through this approach we aim, for an impact in which Dutch landscapes recover their biodiversity, become climate resilient, and provide a healthy living environment. We focus on these landscape as they cover a large part of the Netherlands and have a large potential to contribute to this impact: multifunctional resilient grasslands can benefit people and nature, forests are a key component of climate mitigation and adaptation strategies, and our urban environment has the potential to create healthy environments for people and nature. A cross-discipline, cross-scale approach for these ecosystems and their connections enables us to steer and support their management and design, but is still lacking.

    In COMBINED we will 1) unravel how changes in biodiversity and climate interact in Dutch landscapes, 2) evaluate the effects of existing measures and strategies on biodiversity recovery, climate mitigation and adaptation, ecosystem services, and 3) identify what social, political and institutional obstacles influence the implementation of such measures and strategies and how they can be removed and by whom. Our consortium is well-positioned to carry out this urgent and innovative project with the following envisioned breakthroughs: 1) harmonized methods to understand climate change and biodiversity recovery, leading to knowledge on the transferability of these approaches and the ability to model the impact of future interventions, 2) critical analysis, studying why, in the face of well-known problems, changes in management have not taken place contributes to the robustness and actionability of our results, and 3) broadly supported visions on future landscape management to break through lock-in in current policies, to make space for successful, adaptive, and integrated management and policy options.

    COMBINED is funded via the Dutch Research Agenda (NWA) theme Climate and Nature.

    Contact

  • Rurban Ateliers: Co-imagining alternative futures, socio-spatial relationships, and policy actions for just sustainability transformations, 2024-2029

    As part of the TPS-based Rurban Futures Collective, this project works at the interface (i.e., spatial, social, cultural, political, technological) between the ‘rural’ and the ‘urban’, or rurban. Specifically, we propose a rurban lens to explore and re-imagine rural-urban socio-economic interconnections, everyday materiality and practices, and desirable future pathways. By engaging in experiencing alternative futures through transdisciplinary design and creative methods, we aim to explore the prefigurative potential of such methods and their capacity to affect collective imaginaries about inhabiting rurban space, practising rurban lifestyles, and generating new narratives of sustainable futures. We also focus on political and governance questions behind shifts in everyday practices and on possibilities for collective action to shape and achieve desirable sustainable futures.

    The project has three objectives:

    1. Developing a conceptual and methodological ‘rurban’ framework, centred on recontextualising and relocating sustainability debates through civic engagement, and informing an alternative to growth-driven technological innovation based on inclusive processes of knowledge coproduction and conviviality.
    2. Examining the imaginative process of knowledge coproduction through prototyping spatial and/or technological interventions in the socio-technical contexts in which local sustainability issues unfold. 
    3. Defining and assessing ‘impact’ in relation to the use of creative methodologies and tools to stimulate engagement, imagination, and action (e.g., shifts in everyday practices, policy implementations). 

    The project partners with Rurban Ateliers (knowledge networks and citizen-centred laboratories focused on experimentation and collaborative learning, urban commoning, and community agriculture projects. A PhD research project works in parallel with the project.

    Contact

Selection of past projects

Partners