Optimizing the educational river basin game 33.21

Assignment number: 33.21

Start of the project: flexible

Required course(s): desired is the Water and Climate course or experience with optimization methods and their implementation in Matlab or Python

Involved organisation(s): UT-MWM

Games are powerful tools in education and management support to offer participants the opportunity to conceptualize management problems, to reflect on behavioral choices or to train decision making. The River Basin Game (Hoekstra, 2012) represents themes of over-abstraction, short-term vs long-term management and individual vs collaborative goals in decision making in water resources management. The game is played dozens of times in MSc courses at the UT and other educational and professional settings.

To make games successful, the main choice dilemma’s should naturally emerge and the schematization of the system managed should be recognizable (Ewan and Seibert, 2016). A model-based schematization does not need to be fully realistic, but represent basic characteristics of the real-life system sufficiently well to make experiences in the game transferrable to lessons-learnt for real-life management (Rodela et al., 2019). In the River Basin Game, a simple model of the water balance and water use costs of the subbasins is used to schematize the system.

Where participants play a game to achieve a perceived best outcome, formal optimization techniques can determine optimal strategies and outcomes (Musah et al., 2020).

In the River Basin Game, these optimal strategies have strange features of high interannually variable water uses that do not connect to intuitive expectations of best management practices; this might leave players with unintended experiences and spurious lessons learnt. The reason for the strange features or their persistence under changing game settings is unknown, and can be sought in specific choices in the representation of the water balance or the costs of water use.

In debriefing discussion that close game sessions, often various restrictions to water use or compensation mechanisms between subbasins are suggested to create incentives to avoid the tragedy of the commons, and sometimes such mechanisms are informally introduced during game-play (Hoekstra, 2012). The influence of such restrictions or mechanisms on optimal resource use and its distribution over the basin is unknown.

game set-up

Research objective

The research objective of this project is to diagnose the appearance of highly interannually variable optimal water use in the River Basin Game, and to design and assess alternative game set-ups to overcome this feature and to include restriction rules or compensation mechanisms moderating appropriate water use.

Approach

The work will consist of the following steps:

A selected alternative game set-up is intended to be used in, at least, future UT MSc education on water resources management and optimization methods.

References

Supervision


Are you interested in this assignment? Contact the Master thesis coordinator.