Using unique survey data on Dutch collective agreement negotiators, the authors model how information about other collective bargaining events influences the probability of negotiators encountering bargaining impasses or industrial action during collective bargaining. Competing hypotheses about this influence, derived from economic, social psychological and sociological approaches, are tested. The findings indicate that information about bargaining outcomes elsewhere has no significant effect on the occurrence of conflict. However, if the information content of spillover refers to the conflict potential in other bargaining events and the sources of information are proximate, the probability of conflict is increased. This suggests that sociological mechanisms offer a compelling alternative to those invoked in economics for explaining the relationship between spillover and conflict.
Thursday 11 December 2014
More recent news
- Mon 7 Jul 2025University of Münster’s ‘RE.connect Fellowship’ awarded to Le Anh Long Strengthening Cross-Border Collaboration
- Tue 24 Jun 2025Awarded: Ola G. El-Taliawi, Ph.D. for the Charles H. Levine Memorial Book Prize, 2025
- Wed 4 Jun 2025Ola G. El-Taliawi, Elected to the Executive Committee of the IPPA
- Mon 2 Jun 2025Inspiring visit of PhD solars of the Konrad Adenauer Stiftung
- Thu 24 Apr 2025BMS - UTQ ceremony