Evidence disclosure strategies in suspect interviewing
The Strategic use of Evidence (SUE) technique is an interview method for enhancing and eliciting verbal cues to deception. Prior research on the SUE-technique has demonstrated that late disclosure (i.e., the evidence is presented after having collected the suspect’s account) is more effective than early disclosure (evidence is disclosed before having collected the subject’s account). The rationale is that if subjects remain unaware of the evidence against them, then lying (vs. truthful) subjects are more likely to withhold critical details, and will thereby provide accounts that contradicts existing evidence (Hartwig, Granhag, & Luke, 2014). The SUE approach has recently been modified to elicit the subject’s forthcomingness and to increase admissions.
The current project will develop new strategic approaches for disclosing evidence to suspect to affect the interview outcome. These strategies will be examined in behavioral experiments.
Investigative interviewing, suspect interrogations, strategic use of evidence
Two students can collaborate on this projects. Please contact BA-Thesis coordinator J.M. Gutteling (firstname.lastname@example.org) if you are interested in this assignment.
Granhag, P.A., & Hartwig, M. (2008). A new theoretical perspective on deception detection: On the psychology of instrumental mind-reading. Psychology, Crime & Law, 14, 189-200.
Granhag, P.A., & Hartwig, M. (2015). The strategic use of evidence (SUE) technique: A conceptual overview. In P. A. Granhag, A. Vrij, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), Deception detection: Current challenges and new approaches (pp. 231-251). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Granhag, P.A., & Luke, T.J. (2018). How to Interview to Elicit Concealed Information: Introducing the Shift-of-Strategy (SoS) Approach. Detecting Concealed Information and Deception: Recent Developments, 271-295.
Granhag, P.A., Strömwall, L. A., Willén, R. M., & Hartwig, M. (2013). Eliciting cues to deception by tactical disclosure of evidence: The first test of the Evidence Framing Matrix. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 18, 341-355. Hartwig, Granhag, Strömwall & Vrij (2005) LHB.