Interactive implementation
Researchers: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
Organisations: |
University of Twente |
|
|
|
TAUW B.V. |
|
|
|
Waterboard Groot Salland |
|
|
|
Waterboard Velt en Vecht |
|
|
|
Waterboard Veluwe |
|
|
|
TU Delft |
|
|
|
Wageningen University |
|
|
|
|
||
Funding: |
National research programme Bsik “Living with Water” Waterboards |
||
|
CSTM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period: |
2006-2010 |
|
|
Background
In the Netherlands, many integrated plans fail during the implementation stage. Causes among others are: the basis for a plan seems to be smaller when plans enter a definite stage and become more tangible. Or, at second thought subsidies and rules appear unable to be united. Little is known on risk perception in relation to water management, as a result initiators can be confronted with unpleasant surprises in the process. Interactive implementation, in which the implementation starts, for example, already during the planning stage, can be a solution.
Objectives
To test the principles of Interactive Implementation, in which the project stages of policy towards management are a parallel process instead of a serial process. It is thought that this method provides improvements with respect to uncertainties, exploiting knowledge from practice and to deal with overregulation.
