2001 Publications

CSTM

Annual Report 2001

Contents

Introduction 5

Board, scientific and administrative staff CSTM 7

and Cartesius Institute

Ongoing research projects 9

List of publications 19

Participation in international research groups 27

Environmental post graduate program 31

CSTM graduate en post graduate teaching activities 33

Scientific and professional activities of CSTM staff 35

Congress participation 37

Introduction

It is a pleasure to offer you the annual report 2001. The report gives an overview of our research and teaching activities. In 2001 CSTM attracted several new research projects commissioned by governmental agencies, among others, on the theme of regional planning and public participation. CSTM also got a new EU funded project on water management, a project starting in 2002. A new NWO funded project on sustainable food production started in September. Next to these new projects, many of CSTM’s research projects continued in 2001. The teaching activities concentrated on the International Master Program Environmental and Energy Management. The Program, first offered in 2000, continued in 2001 with 29 students from the Asian and South American region. The multidisciplinary focus of the course clearly responses demand.

Several developments have challenged CSTM in 2001. First, the University of Twente initiated reforms in the university structure and in the organisation of research and teaching programs. Aim of the operation is quality improvement by means of concentration. In the non-technical field, the priority program ‘Institutional Change’ has been selected as focal point. CSTM participates in this program with its own research program ‘Governance of Sustainable Development and Environmental Quality’. Second, a similar trend of concentration is ongoing in the Dutch system of research funding. NWO, the Dutch Science Foundation, changed the conditions for research funding, making it more difficult to attract research money for senior members of the scientific staff in the near future.

In 2001 one of our respected board members, mr. Steegenga from Akzo Nobel, retired and left the board of CSTM in September. His position will be taken by dr. Lopes Cardozo from Akzo Nobel. CSTM also had staff mutations too in 2001. Some people left the institute, whereas others started their research activities. CSTM also hosted a research fellow from the Free University of Berlin for three months in 2001.

Overall, 2001 has been a year full of research and teaching activities. You can read more about it in the report and I hope you will enjoy reading it.

Professor Hans Bressers

Scientific director CSTM

Board and Scientific Staff of CSTM

and Cartesius Institute

Members of the board in 2001

Chair

Dr. J.A. Peters (Dutch Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations)

Members

Prof.dr. J. Feijen (Faculty of Chemical Engineering, University of Twente)

Prof.dr.ir. J.J. Krabbendam (Faculty of Technology and Management,

University of Twente)

Prof.dr. A.E. Steenge (Faculty of Public Administration and Public Policy,

University of Twente)

Drs. H. Steegenga (Akzo Nobel, the Netherlands, until September 1^st)

Dr. H.A. Lopes Cardozo (Akzo Nobel, the Netherlands, from September 1^st)

Scientific Staff CSTM in 2001

Dr. M.J. Arentsen

Prof.dr. J.Th.A. Bressers

Dr.ir. T.J.N.M. de Bruijn

Dr. F.H.J.M. Coenen

Drs. V. Dinica

Dr. D.A. Fuchs

Drs. D. Hoek

Drs. P.S. Hofman

Drs. S.W.F. Huijs

Drs. D. Huitema

Drs. A. Kalfagianni (from September 1^st)

Dr. P-J. Klok

Drs. J. Krozer (Cartesius Institute)

Prof.dr. W.M. Lafferty (University of Oslo, ProSus, Norway and CSTM)

Ir. G.J. de Leeuw (Cartesius Institute)

Dr. K.R.D. Lulofs

Drs. N.E. Marquart

Ir. T.J. Matton

Ir. H.G.J. Meynen (from February 15^th till August 1^st)

Prof.dr. L.J. O’Toole Jr. (University of Georgia, USA and CSTM)

Dr. R.A. van de Peppel

Dr. G.J.I. Schrama

Drs. S.J. Schuurman (Cartesius Institute)

Drs. E.M. van de Ven (Cartesius Institute)

Drs. K.A. van der Veer (from February 1st)

Dr. J. Woltjer

Administration

Mr. M.B.J. Borggreve

Mrs. S. Elsinga (Cartesius Institute)

Mrs. A. Jason (Cartesius Institute)

Mrs. A.H.M. Krooshoop

People leaving in 2001

Ir. T. van Dam

Mrs. S. Elsinga (Cartesius Institute)

Ir. H.G.J. Meynen

Drs. S.J. Schuurman (Cartesius Institute)

www.utwente.nl/cstm

On the website of CSTM you can find the curriculum vitae of the staff with information about their research interests and publications.

Ongoing Research Projects

In this section of our annual report you will find the ongoing research projects of 2001. For a more extensive overview see the website of CSTM: www.utwente.nl/cstm.

The effects of governance structures on the application and development of sustainable technologies in the electricity industries of Western Europe

Funding:	Center for Clean Technology and Environmental Policy (CSTM), University of Twente
Period:	1998 - 2002
Researcher(s):	Valentina Dinica
Supervisor(s):	Hans Bressers, Maarten Arentsen
Summary:	The main scientific goal of the project is to develop a theoretical model that is able to underpin the combined effect of governance structures in the electricity industries and different intermediary factors on the promotion and development of sustainable electricity technologies. In order to achieve this goal, the project will study what types of governance structures can be theoretically distinguished in the electricity sector and which are the preconditions for the development of sustainable technologies that lay both inside and outside the institutional organization of the industry. Sustainable electricity technologies are defined as based on co-generation and renewable resources. Hypotheses will be formulated with regard to the characteristics of governance structures that can create a favorable institutional environment for the promotion of such technologies. These hypotheses will be tested in the empirical part of the project for a number of Western European countries. The empirical study will analyze the governance structures of the electricity sectors in these countries both prior and consequent to the adoption of the EU Directive 96/92/Ec for the creation of a single European market for electricity. The final objective of the empirical analysis is to understand if and how the liberalization of the electricity industries will influence the penetration of sustainable electricity technologies in Western European markets

Management of Technology Responses to the Climate Change Challenge (MATRIC)

Funding:	National Research Program on Global Air Pollution and Climate Change
Projectpartners:	Department of Technology and Management, Department of Philosophy of Science and Technology of the University of Twente, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation Technology of the University of Maastricht
Period:	1998 - 2001
Researcher(s):	Theo de Bruijn, Valentina Dinica, Peter Hofman, Edwin Marquart
Supervisor(s):	Maarten Arentsen
Summary:	This project develops and tests a co-evolutionary perspective on technological change and innovation to contribute to the improvement of present - climate change - innovation policy.

Environmental Affairs and European Integration: Comparative analysis of

changing national policy arrangements

Funding:	Twente University Research Priority Program (OSF)
Projectpartners:	This project is part of the research program National Sovereignty and International Dependency. This is a joint program of the Faculty of Public Administration and Public Policy, Faculty of Philosophy, Techology and Society, Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS), the Netherlands Institute of Government NIG, Center for Clean Technology and Environmental Policy (CSTM)
Period:	1998 - 2002
Researcher(s):	Theo de Bruijn
Supervisor(s):	Hans Bressers
Summary:	The focus of this project is on analyzing the changes that European integration induces on institutional arrangements of national environmental policy making and identifying the factors that can explain those changes. Underlying hypothesis is that since international dependency on environmental affairs is relatively high and the degree of institutionalization of the policy field is relatively low European integration will lead to convergence in national arrangements. Field of study is environmental policy aiming at industries.

Water Governance and Institutional Change

Funding:	Travel grants from Dutch National Science Foundation (NWO), Netherlands Interuniversity Institute of Government (NOB), other funding from Center for Clean Technology and Environmental Policy (CSTM)
Period:	1995 - 2002
Researcher:	Stefan Kuks
Supervisor:	Hans Bressers
Summary:	The notion of governance is getting increasing attention in public administration and policy science. For comparative studies on a particular policy sector in different states, countries or periods, it is just not sufficient to understand a policy sector only in terms of the policy content (goals and instruments). The same counts if one has to understand the context of policy making and implementation. The features of public authorities and target groups as well as the features of their actions and interactions are influenced by such aspects as the administrative capacity available for policy implementation, the different problem perceptions being at stake, the positions and links of actors in policy networks or arena’s, and the relations between the different administrative levels involved. In this project a model of governance is being developed and used to facilitate comparative research on governance systems. Five elements of governance have been identified (levels of governance; actors in the policy network; problem perception and objectives; strategy and instruments; responsibilities and resources for implementation). Also the dynamics of such a governance system are being explored, by looking at mechanisms for institutional change. The model is applied to compare the governance systems for groundwater and drinking water protection in Florida and the Netherlands. More specifically, we are looking at the protection against nitrates and pesticides used in agriculture and which, via the groundwater, can cause contamination of the drinking water supply. The question is to what extent different states with similar policy problems develop a similar policy response, to what extent there may be striking differences and how these differences can be explained by the mechanisms which determine a governance system. Furthermore, the developed model of governance is used to explore the long-term evolution of water governance in the Netherlands. The Dutch evolution will be compared with the evolutions in five other European countries (Belgium, France, Spain, Italy and Switzerland). We are identifying transitions in water policies and water rights, and try to find the conditions that have been triggering these transitions towards more sustainable water management. This won’t be only a story about the development of public domain; the shifting balance between private and public property rights is also considered to be important for understanding the late 20^th century debate on privatisation of water services.

Analysis of the choice of market-oriented policy instruments

Funding:	Center for Clean Technology and Environmental Policy (CSTM), Twente University
Period:	1995 - 2001
Researcher:	Dave Huitema
Supervisor:	Hans Bressers
Summary:	The project aims at a better understanding of the political and administrative feasibility of market-oriented environmental policy instruments. Although in theory these so-called economic instruments are quite attractive because of their cost-effectiveness, in practice they are rarely applied. Research of the institutional context of decision-making processes can show which criteria influence the choice of economic instruments to be used in practice.

Effectiveness of consensual steering and stimulation of selfregulation in addition to regulatory steering

Funding:	Dutch National Science Foundation (NWO)
Period:	1997 - 2002
Researchers:	Dick Hoek, Rob van de Peppel
Supervisor:	Hans Bressers
Summary:	In this project the additional effects of alternative steering approaches, like negotiated regulations, covenants and stimulation of selfregulation, are examined. The project is focusing on alternative steering approaches that are used in combination with environmental permit systems for industries.

Local government and climate policy

Funding:	National Research Program on Global Air Pollution and Climate Change
Projectpartners:	ECN Policy Studies Netherlands Energy Research Foundation
Period:	1999 - 2001
Researcher:	Frans Coenen
Supervisor:	Frans Coenen
Summary:	In theory local climate options are known, but their implementation faces institutional barriers. Local governments can play an important role to relieve these barriers. The objective of the project is to enhance the contribution of local governments to climate policy. Four phases can be distinguished in the present project.
	Phase 1 includes an identification of the ‘playing field’ for local climate policy in the Netherlands. An overview will be given of the coherence between options for greenhouse gas reduction, local policies, competencies of local governments and the dependence on third parties.The municipal playing field is not static, but depends on social-geographic characteristics and is affected by emerging trends in (1) municipal policy making, (2) municipal competence in climate protection and (3) the changing relations with third parties. In phase 2 case studies and an evaluation of experiences in practise will deliver insight in the existing barriers for local governments in the implementation of reduction options. A trend analysis will show possible future changes in these barriers.To enhance the contribution of local governments in climate policy a systematic integrative approach is necessary. Using the insights gained from the research in Phase 2, phase 3 includes the design of a model for a local climate protection policy system. This system is comparable with a quality- or environmental care-system, given the perspective that system means systematically introducing considerations in a very broad field of decision making and activities. In phase 4 this model will be applied and evaluated in three pilot projects.

Coping with citizen participation

Funding:	Scholarship of British Council; other funding from Center for Clean Technology and Environmental Policy (CSTM)
Period:	1996 - 2002
Researcher:	Dave Huitema
Supervisor:	Hans Bressers
Summary:	Finding locations for waste treatment facilities is generally considered a problem. Three strategies seem to be possible in practice. One is to rationalize decision making, which implies centralization and treating expert knowledge as the legitimate basis for decisions. The assumption is that by the scientific method, the 'right' place for a facility can be determined. A second strategy is to trust on the clash of interests in society. Societal actors are expected to be capable of making their own decisions, and as long as the decision making arena is not structurally inaccessible to certain groups in society, it is expected that an acceptable solution will result. The third strategy however, does not trust on interests, but on argumentation and dialogue. By maximizing meaningful participation, which can only be based in a local community, those involved will define the best solution themselves. This project is an international comparative attempt to establish which strategies are used in Canada, the UK and the Netherlands in laws that regulate decision making processes, and to see how the quality of the decision making processes is thereby affected. Quality of decision making is operationalised in three different ways, that are connected to the three strategies of decision making. A first definition of quality places emphasis on scientific expertise, a second conception stresses opne access, and a third highlights the role of dialogue. Actual decision making processes in the three countries will be judged using these different parameters for quality.

Startegies for the management of inherent uncertainties: links between the cognitive structures of risk and the political structures of uncertainty

Funding:	Center for Clean Technology and Environmental Policy (CSTM), Twente University
Period:	1999 - 2003
Researcher(s):	Simone Huijs
Supervisor(s):	Rob Hoppe
Summary:	In environmental and sustainable development policy issues, public authorities face emergent complexity, high value diversity, difficult-to-structure problems, high decision stakes, high uncertainty, and thus risk. In practice, this often leads to crises, controversies, deadlocks, and policy fiascoes. Decisionmakers face a crisis in coping with uncertainty. Both the cognitive structure of uncertainty and the political structure of risk decisions have been studied. So far, these scientific literature exists side by side, with few apparent efforts at theoretically conceptualizing and empirically testing the links between the two. Therefore, this exploratory project takes up the challenge to link the two together and test this framework to several real-life cases. The research project's importance is twofold, theoretical and empirical. Its empirical importance can be derived from its conceptual framework, which is an attempt at synthesis between hitherto separate theoretical strands of thinking about relations between science, uncertainty, risk, and politics. The first strand is standard epistemological thinking about the cognitive structure of risk, and its concomitant methods of uncertainty analysis. Functowicz and Ravetz' (1992) demonstration of the emergence of a post-normal scientific practice dealing with problems of high uncertainty and value-loading, clearly shows that 'puzzle-solving' (Kuhn) and the expectation of 'normality' are no longer satisfactory assumptions for methods of uncertainty analysis. The second strand of thinking, concerns the cultural theory of the political construction of risk, as pioneered by Douglas and Wildavsky (1982), rooted in Douglas' anthropological and sociological grid/group cultural theory (1970; 1986). More recently, Hisschemoller and Hoppe have developed their theory about types of problem structuring in policymaking (1996) into a third strand of theorizing about the relationship between problem types, policy process types, and types of scientific practice (Hisschemoller, et.al, 1998). Although each of these theories have roots in different intellectual traditions and practical concerns, they are treated here as complementary perspectives to be united in one theory, inspired by prior effort at synthesis by Jerry Ravetz (1999). The empirical claim to novelty simply rests on this project's intention to falsify/corroborate key elements of the new theory through comparative case analysis.

European Water Regimes and the Notion of a Sustainable Status (EUWARENESS)

Funding:	European Commission, DG XII
Projectpartners:	Universite Catholique de Louvain (Belgium)
	Universite Francois Rabelais de Tours (France)
	Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona (Spain)
	Istituto per la Ricerca Sociale (Milaan-Italy)
	Institut de Hautes Etudes en Administration Publique (Lausanne-Switzerland)
Period:	2000 - 2002
Researcher(s):	Hans Bressers, Doris Fuchs, Dave Huitema, Stefan Kuks
Supervisor(s):	Stefan Kuks
Summary:	By studying 12 cases in 6 European countries (Netherlands, Belgium, France, Spain, Italy, Switzerland), the project intends to get a better understanding of the dynamic relationships between rival uses of water resources, the resource regimes under which these uses are managed, and the factors in the political-institutional context that are generating regime shifts. The final purpose is to assess the effectiveness of different water resource regimes, and to identify ways in which they can become more effectively sustainable. The project will contribute to the new European Water Policy Fframework where a ‘good status of water’ in the meaning of sustainable use of water resources has been put forward as a major principle. While looking at property and use rights, the researchers are identifying users, identifying the importance they have in using water in a certain way, identifying the extent to which they are paying a price for it, and identifying the extent to which they have a say or participate in managing the water resources in their river basin area. The new framework is considering these elements as important keys to a sustainable status of water resources. The researchers are using a theoretical framework on institutional regime analysis, which combines property rights theory, institutional rational choice, and political science (policy analysis, policy design theory), in order to innovate the theory of institutional regime. This project is funded by the 5th European Program (key action ‘Sustainable Management and Quality of Water’).

Monitoring of Cleaner Production

Funding:	Province of Overijssel
Period:	2001 - 2001
Researcher(s):	Maarten Arentsen, Theo de Bruijn, Rob van de Peppel, Johan Woltjer
Supervisor(s):	Theo de Bruijn
Summary:	Ïn 2001 the Province of Overijssel published a note called "Cleaner Production; on the road to improved environmental performance of SMEs". The note aims at creating a synergy between environmental and economic performance and asks intermediary organizations to step forward and develop projects. On request of the province, CSTM developed a system for monitoring implementation and results.

Monitoring policy agreement environmental enforcement

Funding:	PWC
Period:	2001 - 2001
Researcher(s):	Rob van de Peppel
Supervisor(s):	Rob van de Peppel
Summary:	Monitoring policy agreements environmental enforcement

Sustainable Technology in the Regional Market

Funding:	Novem
Period:	2001 - 2001
Researcher(s):	Maarten Arentsen, Theo de Bruijn, Geerten Schrama, Annika van der Veer
Supervisor(s):	Geerten Schrama
Summary:	Research project commissed by the Novem (Netherlands Agency for Energy and the Environment) on present activities of regional innovation networks in the Netherlands. The project in particular asnalyses the extent to which these networks pay attention to the so-called 'non-technical aspects' of stimulating sustainable innovations by SMEs. The project aims to contribute to the improvement of the role of Novem’s sub-programme "Technology in the Market" (part of the Environment & Technology programme) in stimulating sustainable innovations in the regional market.

Evaluation of the Starting Phase of the Programme Sustainable Purchasing

Funding:	Ministry of the Environment
Projectpartners:	PriceWaterHouseCoopers N.V. (CSTM is sub-contractor to PCW)
Period:	2001 - 2001
Researcher(s):	Geerten Schrama (for CSTM)
Supervisor(s):	Geerten Schrama (for CSTM)
Summary:	The project concerns the evaluation of the starting phase of the Programme Sustainable Purchasing. This is a programme initiated by the Ministry of the Environment as part of the implementation of the white paper on Environment and Economy. The research question is: to what extent have the performed activities and the developed instruments and products made a contribution to the realization of the targets of the Programme Sustainable Purchasing, and in which direction should be selected for continuation and improvement of the programme?

National policy and central funding for Local Agenda 21. A comparative analysis of front-running European states

Funding:	University of Oslo, ProSus, Centre for Development and the Environment
Projectpartners:	Prosus
Period:	2001 -
Researcher(s):	Frans Coenen
Supervisor(s):	Bill Lafferty
Summary:	A comparative study on central-government policies and funding for Local Agenda 21 in the Nordic countries and the Netherlands.

Technological regime shifts to environmental sustainability

Funding:	Dutch Scientific Organisation, Research programme on Environment and Economy
Projectpartners:	UT-WMW, Merit
Period:	2000 - 2002
Researcher(s):	Peter Hofman
Supervisor(s):	Dr. R. Kemp
Summary:	The project investigates how a technological transition to more sustainable development paths may be achieve or accelerated. We investigate what possible technological paths to environmental sustainability are in various sectors, and what the options are for managing the transition process into a new regime in an ordered, non-disruptive way.

The practice of enforcement of environmental regulation

Funding:	ECWM
Projectpartners:	Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Vakgroep Bestuursrecht en Bestuurskunde
Period:	2001 - 2001
Researcher(s):	Geerten Schrama, Dick Hoek
Supervisor(s):	Rob van de Peppel
Summary:	The project assesses the quality of enforcement of Dutch environmental regulation and evaluates the impact of voluntary agreements on the quality of enforcement practices.

Evaluation of the Regional Plans 'Waterland' and 'Kennemerland'

Funding:	Provincial Government of North-Holland, Policy Evaluation Committee
Period:	2001 - 2001
Researcher(s):	Frans Coenen, Johan Woltjer
Supervisor(s):	Johan Woltjer
Summary:	This project entails a study into the effectiveness of two regional plans in the Province of North-Holland: 'Waterland' and 'Kennemerland'. It emphasises the function of these plans as frames of reference for local land use plans and other spatial planning documents. The evaluation mainly includes the following elements: the regional plans 'Waterland' and 'Kennemerland' as spatial frames of reference, the differences between both regional plans in the period between 1988 and 2000, the (expected) goals achievements, the functioning of the provincial government, and the role of regional plans as frames of reference in the future, considering external developments.

Meta-evaluation Advocacy Coalition Framework in the European Context

Funding:	University of Twente, faculty of Public Administration and Public Policy
Period:	2001 - 2003
Researcher(s):	Kris Lulofs
Supervisor(s):	Rob Hoppe
Summary:	The project is a meta-evaluation of the Advocacy Coalition Framework of Paul Sabatier. The project exists of three modules. The first module is a case-study on the restructuring of social security in the Netherlands in the period 1987-2001. The second module reflects upon the usefulness of the ACF in the European context, the research method is secondary analysis. The third module aims to elaborate the aspect of resource-dependency in the ACF.

The effectiveness and efficiency of environmental regulation: The Dutch effluent charges

Funding:	Smith Richardson Foundation (USA); CSTM
Period:	2001-2003
Partners:	Resources for the Future, Washington, USA
Researchers:	Hans Bressers, Kris Lulofs
Summary:	In the debate on command-and-control vs. economic incentive policy instruments for environmental protection, often too little attention is paid to careful ex post analyses and comparisons of instruments in actual practice. In this project several pairwise comparisons are made. Each comparison is made by teams from the US and Europe. On the field of water management a comparison is made between US direct regulation (RFF) and Dutch effluent charges (CSTM).

SusGov: Governance for sustainable development: addressing a need for new approaches and more effective mechanisms

Funding:	ProSus (Norway); CSTM
Partners:	ProSus as coordinator and researchers from several European countries
Period:	2001-2003
Researchers:	Hans Bressers, Bill Lafferty, Larry O’Toole
Supervisor:	Bill Lafferty
Summary:	As the strategies to attain a more sustainable development are being pursued in ever more directions, there is a need for a careful re-examination of these opportunities and their restrictions. The international SusGov team is preparing a book in which these strategies are evaluated.

Governance across social scales for sustainable development

Funding:	CSTM
Partners:	Faculty of Political Science – University of Florida
Period:	2000 – 2002
Researchers:	Maarten Arentsen, Hans Bressers, Theo de Bruijn, Frans Coenen, Valentina Dinica, Stefan Kuks, Kris Lulofs, Larry O’Toole
Supervisors:	Hans Bressers, Tony Rosenbaum (Florida)
Summary:	It shows however, that governance for sustainable development requires multi level governance. This is by no means a simple solution. It creates many new challenges. The project analyses the different angles of the challenges of multi-level governance and illustrates the argument with cases from Europe, the United States and south America.

List of Publications

Scientific

Aall, C., W.M. Lafferty and G. Lindseth, Ansvars- og myndighetsfordeling mellom stat og kommune på miljøområdet (The Allocation of Resposibility and authority in the Area of Environmental Policy between the State and Municipality in Norway), Report prepared for the Ministry of the Environment, Oslo: ProSus Report 3/01, pp. 1-202.

Arentsen, Maarten J., Rolf W. Künneke, Dutch Negotiated Regulation: Conceptualisation and Illustration, in: Atle Midttun and Eirik Svindland (eds.), Approaches and Dilemmas in Economic Regulation, New York: Palgrave, 2001, pp. 27-55.

Arentsen, Maarten, Valentina Dinica, Edwin Marquart, Innovating Innovation Policy. Rethinking Green Innovation Policy in Evolutionary Perspective, Economies et Sociétés, Serie Dynamique technologique et organisation, no. 6, 4/2001, pp. 563-583.

Arentsen, Maarten J. en Jan W. Eberg, Modulation of Sociotechnical Change as Climate Change Challenge. Dutch National Programme on Global Air Pollution and Climate Change, Bilthoven, 2001, ISBN 90 5851 076 x, pp. 1-116.

Arentsen, Maarten J., Jan Willem Fabius and Rolf W. Künneke, Dutch Business Strategies Under Regime Transition, in: Atle Mittdun (ed.), European Energy Industry Business Strategies, London: Elsevier Science Ltd, 2001, ISBN 0 08 043631 5, pp. 151-195.

Arentsen, Maarten and Valentina Dinica, Green Electricity in the Netherlands, The Norwegian School of Management, Centre for Energy and Environment, Sandvika, 2001, ISSN 1501-2697, pp. 1-65.

Arentsen, Maarten en Rolf Künneke, Marktwerking in de energievoorziening, Tijdschrift voor beleid, politiek en maatschappij, Jrg. 28, Nr. 3, 2001, ISSN 1389-0069, pp. 139-153.

Arentsen, Maarten J., Hans Th. A. Bressers and Laurence J. O’Toole, Jr., Institutional and policy responses to uncertainty in environmental policy: A comparison of Dutch and US styles, in: Walter A. Rosenbaum, and Hans Th.A. Bressers (eds.), Uncertainty and environmental policy, Symposium, in: Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 28, No. 3, 2000, (appearance 2001) pp. 597-611.

Bressers, J.Th.A., P-J. Klok, L.J. O’Toole, Jr., Explaining Policy Action: A Deductive but Realistic Theory, in: World capitalism, governance and community, papers IPSA World Congress 2000, CD-ROM collection, 2001, ISBN 1 902277 34 1, pp. 1-26.

Bressers, Hans Th. A. and Walter A. Rosenbaum, Innovation, learning and environmental policy: Overcoming “a plague of uncertainties”, in: Walter A. Rosenbaum and Hans Th.A. Bressers (eds.), Uncertainty and environmental policy, Symposium, in: Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 28, No. 3, 2000, (appearance 2001) pp. 523-539.

Bressers, Hans and Josee Ligteringen, Political-administrative policies for sustainable household behavior, paper Sustainability at the Millennium: Globalization, competitiveness & the public trust; The 9th Greening of Industry Network Conference, Bangkok, January 21-24, 2001, published on CD-ROM proceedings, pp. 1-20.

Bressers, Hans en Stefan Kuks, Governance patronen als verbreding van het beleidsbegrip, in: Beleidswetenschap, Vol. 15, nr. 1, 2001, ISSN 0921-1934, pp. 76-104.

Bressers, Hans Th.A., Stefan M.M. Kuks and Geerten J.I. Schrama, Negotiated agreements between water suppliers and farmers in the context of changing water networks in Europe, in: Cesare Dosi (ed.), Agricultural use of groundwater, Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001, ISBN 0 7923 6805 3, pp. 169-194.

Bressers, Hans Th. A., Instruments in environmental policy and their mutual relations, in: J.J. Bouma, J. van Ham and M.H.A. Wind, Milieu te koop? Marktconforme instrumenten voor het milieubeleid, ‘s-Hertogenbosch: VVM, 2001, ISBN 90 76108 04 8, pp. 1-14.

Bruijn, T.J.N.M. de, and P.S. Hofman, Pollution Prevention in SMEs; Evoking Structural Changes through partnerships, in: Greener Management International, ISSN 0966-9671, 2000, vol. 30, pp. 71-82.

Bruijn, T.J.N.M. de, Environmental management in a printing company; Transformation patterns in the Dutch industry, in: Ken Green, Peter Groenewegen and Peter Hofman (eds.), Ahead of the Curve: Cases of Innovation in Environmental Management, Dordrecht. Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001, ISBN 0 7923 6804 5, pp. 41-62.

Bruijn, T.J.N.M. de, The Transfer of Environmental Policy Arrangements: The Importance of the National Context, proceedings of the 9^th International Conference of the Greening of Industry Network (CD-Rom) “Sustainability at the Millenium: Globabilization, competitiveness, and the Public Trust”, Bangkok, January 21-24 2001.

Coenen, F.H.J.M., Planningsconcepties en -praktijken, in: T. Abma en R. In ’t Veld (red), Handboek beleidswetenschap, perspectieven, thema's, praktijkvoorbeelden, Amsterdam: Boom, 2001, ISBN 90 5352 6951, pp. 41-54.

Coenen, F.H.J.M., D. Huitema and J. Woltjer, Trends and Issues in Participatory Decision Making for Sustainable Consumption, Policy case Study, Environmental directorate, Paris: OECD, 2001, pp. 1-45.

Coenen, F.H.J.M., Probing the essence of LA21 as a value-added approach to sustainable development and local democracy; the case of the Netherlands, in: W.M. Lafferty (ed.), Sustainable communities in Europe, Earthscan, 2001, ISBN 18 5383 790 3, pp. 153-179.

Coenen, F.H.J.M., W.M. Lafferty, Conclusions and Perspectives, in: W.M. Lafferty (ed.), Sustainable communities in Europe, Earthscan, 2001, ISBN 18 5383 790 3, pp. 266-304

Coenen, F.H.J.M., R. van de Peppel en J. Woltjer, De evolutie van inspraak in de Nederlandse planning. Beleidswetenschap, Vol. 15, nr. 4, 2001, pp. 313-332

Coenen, F., H. Burger, M. Kaal en M. Menkveld, Evaluatie van het speelveld lokaal klimaatbeleid, rapport 2e fase van het NOP-project ‘Lokale Overheden en Klimaatbeleid’, ECN-C--01-083, Petten, 2001, pp. 1-96.

Coenen, F., H. Burger en M. Menkveld, Het speelveld van lokaal klimaatbeleid, rapport fase 1 van het NOP-project ‘Lokale Overheden en Klimaatbeleid’, ECN-C--01-045, Petten, 2001, pp. 1-65

Coenen, F.H.J.M., E. Marquart en R. Meynen, Evaluatie Programma Lokale en Regionale Energiebesparing (Loreen), Enschede: Centrum voor Schone Technologie en Milieubeleid, 2001, CSTM-SR no 167, ISSN 1381-6357, pp.1-103.

Dinica, Valentina, Barriers and solutions for the market diffusion of three selected renewables-based technologies, in: Journal of the Central European University, Budapest: CEU/OSI Publications Office, Summer 2001, Vol. 4, pp. 5-21,

Edelenbos, Jurian, Arthur Edwards, Rob van de Peppel en Anchrit Wille, Introductie op de cases, in: Jurian Edelenbos en Rene Monnikhof (red.), Lokale interactieve beleidsvorming; een vergelijkend onderzoek naar de consequenties van interactieve beleidsvorming voor het functioneren van de lokale democratie, Utrecht: LEMMA, 2000, ISBN 90 5189 878 9, pp. 67-86.

Edelenbos, Jurian, Rene Monnikhof, Jan Willem Duyvendak, Arthur Edwards, Ingrid Horstik, Joop Koppenjan, Andre Krouwel, Rob van de Peppel en Anchrit Wille, Interactieve beleidsvorming: de inspraak achterna? in: Jurian Edelenbos en Rene Monnikhof (red.), Lokale interactieve beleidsvorming; een vergelijkend onderzoek naar de consequenties van interactieve beleidsvorming voor het functioneren van de lokale democratie, Utrecht: LEMMA, 2000, ISBN 90 5189 878 9, p. 215-232

Fuchs, Doris and Sylvia Lorek, An inquiry into the impact of globalization on the potential for sustainable consumption in households, ProSus report 2/01, Oslo: University of Oslo.

Green, K., P. Groenewegen and Peter S. Hofman (eds.) Ahead of the Curve: Case Studies of Innovation in Environmental Management, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001, ISBN 0 7923 6804 5, pp. 1-240.

Green, K., P. Groenewegen and Peter S. Hofman, Ahead of the Curve: Introduction, in: K. Green, P. Groenewegen and Peter S. Hofman (eds.) Ahead of the Curve: Case Studies of Innovation in Environmental Management, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001, ISBN 0 7923 6804 5, pp. 5-17.

Hoek, Dick en Rob van de Peppel, Effecten van het doelgroepenbeleid industrie bij lagere overheden, Enschede: Centrum voor Schone Technologie en Milieubeleid, 2001, CSTM-SR nr. 168, ISSN 1381-6357, pp.1-20.

Hofman, P.S., Biomass Combustion for ‘Green’ Electricity Supply, A Case Study of Innovation at the Cuijk Biomass-fired Power Plant, Dutch Case Study Report No. 5 for the ENVINNO Project, Enschede: Center for Clean Technology and Environmental Policy, 2001, CSTM SR no 164, ISSN 1381-6357, pp. 1-34.

Hofman, P.S., N.E. Marquart, Electricity in Flux, Sociotechnical Change in the Electricity System, 1970-2000, Bilthoven: Dutch National Research Programme on Global Air Pollution and Climate Change, 2001, ISBN 90 5851 0522, pp. 1-202.

Kuks, Stefan, The privatisation debate on water services in the Netherlands. An examination of the public duty of the Dutch water sector and the implications of market forces and water chain cooperation. In: Fritz Holzwarth, R. Andreas Kraemer (Hrsg.), Umweltaspekte einer Privatisierung der Wasserwirtschaft in Deutschland. Dokumentation der Internationale Fachtagung vom 20. und 21. November 2000 in Berlin, Berlin: Ecologic, 2001, ISBN 3-8311-1624-5, pp. 81-112.

Lafferty, W.M. (ed.), Sustainable Communities in Europe, London: Earthscan Publications Ltd, pp. 1-314.

Lafferty, W.M., Participation and Democratic Theory, in: Frank Heller (ed.) Managing Democratic Organizations, Abingdon, Oxen: Ashgate Publishers.

Lafferty, W.M., Local Agenda 21: The Puirsuit of Sustainable Development in subnational domains, in: Dimitri Devuyst (ed.) How Green is the City?: sustainability Assessment and the Management of Urban Environments, New York: Columbia University Press.

Lafferty, W.M., Adapting Government Practice to the goals of Sustainable Development, paper prepared for the OECD/PUMA seminar on “Improving Governance for Sustainable Development”, Paris 22-23 november.

Lulofs, K.R.D., Implementation of the European Municipal Waste Incineration Directive (89/429/EEC): lessons from four member states; in: European Environment, Volume 11, Issue 5, 2001, ISSN 0961-0405 pp 265-280. (co-authors S. Schucht, A. Bültman and M. Eames) (Special Issue: The Implementation of EU Environmental Policy. Issue Edited by Frank Wätzold).

Lulofs, K.R.D., EMAS and regulatory relief in Europe: lessons from national experience, in: European Environment, Volume 11, Issue 1, 2001, ISSN 0961-0405, pp. 47-48. (co-authors F. Wätzold, A. Bültman, M. Eames and S. Schucht).

Lulofs, Kris, Implementing Command and Control Directives: the case of Directive 89/429/EEC, in: Matthieu Glachant (ed.), Implementing European Environmental Policy: The Impacts of Directives in the Member States, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2001, pp. 81-109.

Lulofs, Kris, Schonere afvalverbranding: Zijn de Europese richtlijn en de nationale regimes kosten-effectief?, in: Beleidswetenschap, Vol. 15, nr. 4, pp. 333-355.

Lulofs, Kris en Maarten Arentsen, Improving Quality and Learning Performance of ‘Energie 2000’, ISBN 90-365-16129, pp. 1-106.

Maquart, Edwin en Rob van de Peppel, Achtergronden bij landelijke integrale handhavingsrapportage, Enschede: Centrum voor Schone Technologie en Milieubeleid, juli 2001, CSTM-SR nr. 162, ISSN 1381-6357, pp. 1-42.

Needham, B. en D. Huitema, Instrumenten voor omgevingsbeleid. Over de keuze tussen integreren en het bundelen van beleidsinstrumenten, in: D. de Roo en M. Schwartz (red.), Omgevingsplanning, een innovatief proces, Den Haag: Sdu, 2001, ISBN 90 1208 9069, pp. 31-42.

O’Toole, Laurence J. Jr., Jeffrey Brudney and Hal G. Rainey (eds.), Advancing Public Management: New Developments in Theory, Methods and Practice, Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, 2001, ISBN 0 87840 859 2, pp. 1-340.

O’Toole, Laurence J. Jr. and Kenneth J. Meier, Managerial Strategies and Behavior in Networks, in: Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 11, no. 3, 2001, ISSN 1053-18582, pp. 271-293.

O’Toole, Laurence J. Jr. and John Peterson, Federal Governance in the United States and the European Union: A Policy Network Perspecive, in: Kalypso Nicolaidis and Robert Howse, (eds), The Federal Vision: Legitimacy and Levles of Governnace in the United States and the European Union , Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, ISBN 0-19-924501-0, pp. 299-334.

O’Toole, L.J. Jr. and K. Hanf and P. Hupe, Managing Implementation Processes in Networks, in: Stephen P. Osborne (ed.), Public Management: Critical Perspectives. Volume 2. The Plural State. London: Routledge, 2001, ISBN 0415233801, pp. 137-151.

O’Toole, Laurence J. Jr., Jeffrey Brudney and Hal G. Rainey, Introduction: Public Management in an Era of Complexity and Challenge, in: Brudney, O’Toole en Rainey, (reds.), Advancing Public Management, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2001, ISBN 0-87840-859-2, pp. 1-12.

O’Toole, Laurence J. Jr., Different Public Managements? Implications of Structural Context in Hierarchies and Networks, in: Brudney, O’Toole en Rainey (reds.) Advancing Public Management, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2001, ISBN 0-87840-859-2, pp. 14-32.

O’Toole, Laurence J. Jr., Jeffrey Brudney and Hal G. Rainey, Concluding Perspectives, in: Brudney, O’Toole en Rainey (reds.) Advancing Public Management, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2001, ISBN 0-87840-859-2, pp. 253-259

Peppel, Rob van de, Effecten van interactieve beleidsvorming, in: Jurian Edelenbos en Rene Monnikhof (red.), Lokale interactieve beleidsvorming; een vergelijkend onderzoek naar de consequenties van interactieve beleidsvorming voor het functioneren van de lokale democratie, Utrecht: LEMMA, 2000, ISBN 90 5189 878 9, pp. 33-49.

Peppel, Rob van de, Dick Hoek, Pieter-Jan Klok, Een model voor de analyse van effecten van milieubeleid gericht op consumenten, Enschede: Centrum voor Schone Technologie en Milieubeleid, 2001, CSTM-SR no 159, ISSN 1381-6357, pp.1-51.

Rosenbaum, Walter A. and Hans Th.A. Bressers (eds.), Uncertainty and environmental policy, Symposium, in: Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 28, No. 3, 2000 (appearance 2001), pp. 521-672.

Rosenbaum, Walter A. and Hans Th. A. Bressers, Uncertainty as environmental education, in: Walter A. Rosenbaum and Hans Th.A. Bressers (eds.), Uncertainty and environmental policy, Symposium, in: Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 28, No. 3, 2000, (appearance 2001) pp. 668-672.

Schrama, G.J.I., Sustainable banking at the Rabobank, in: K. Green, P. Groenewegen and P.S. Hofman (eds.), Ahead of the curve. Cases of innovation in environmental management. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001, ISBN 0 7923 6804 5, pp. 77-91.

Schrama, G.J.I., K.A. van der Veer, Duurzame technologie in de regionale markt. Onderzoeksrapport in opdracht van Novem. Enschede: Centrum voor Schone technologie en Milieubeleid, 2001, CSTM-SR nr.163, ISSN 1381-6357. pp. 1-85.

Schrama, G.J.I., Case study Nuon. Dutch Case Study Report for the ENVINNO Project. Enschede: Universiteit Twente, Centrum voor Schone Technologie en Milieubeleid, 2001, CSTM-SR no 166., ISSN 1381-6357. pp. 1-23.

Schrama, G., P.S. Hofman, Sustainable innovations through better policy coordination? National report based on comparative analysis of five Dutch ENVINNO case studies, Enschede: Center for Clean Technology and Environmental Policy, 2001, CSTM-SR no 165, ISSN 1381-6357, pp. 1-25.

Woltjer, J., R. van de Peppel, The emergence of a new environmental policy arena for the Dutch horticulture industry, in: Susplan Conference Proceedings, Sustainable Cities Research Institute, University of Northumbria at Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 2001, ISBN 0-9541205-0-7, pp 1-8.

Woltjer, J., en R. A. van de Peppel, Algemene en specifieke kenmerken van inspraakreacties, Inspraak en Kwaliteit Besluitvorming Verkeer en Waterstaat, Eindrapport Fase 2, Enschede, CSTM 2001

Woltjer, J., R. van de Peppel, Algemene en specifieke elementen van inspraakreacties; {Generic and specific elements in public consultation reactions}, project ‘Inspraak en kwaliteit besluitvorming Verkeer en Waterstaat’, report of a study funded by the Ministry of Transport, The Hague.

Woltjer, J., R. Meynen, Evaluatie streekplannen Waterland en Kennemerland; {Evaluation of the Waterland and Kennemerland Regional Plans}, report of a study funded by the Policy Evaluation Committee of the Province of North-Holland, CBE, Haarlem, pp. 1-95.

Woltjer, J., Evaluating complex decision-making processes: An assessment of Dutch communicative planning initiatives, in: H. Voogd (ed.), Recent developments in evaluation in spatial, infrastructure and environmental planning, Groningen: Geo Press, ISBN 90 71971 69 4.

Woltjer, J., Monitoring Environmental Agreements: A Multi-Level Conformity Approach, Sustainable water management in the Twente region, in: P. ten Brink (ed.), Voluntary Environmental Agreements: Process, Practice and Future Use, Greenleaf Publishing, ISBN 1 874719 41.

Professional

Bressers, Hans, Beleidsarrangementen in het milieubeleid: Een reactie, in: Beleidswetenschap, Vol. 15, nr. 3, 2001, ISSN 0921-1934, pp. 229-233.

Bruijn, T.J.N.M. de, M.J. Arentsen and J. Woltjer, “Schoner Produceren”, een advies voor een effectieve en efficiënte monitoringssystematiek; {“Cleaner Production”, an advice for an effective and efficient monitoring approach}, report of a study funded by the Province of Overijssel, Zwolle, CSTM Studies en Rapporten, ISSN 1381-6357, nr 161.

Coenen, F.H.J.M., en H. van de Wal, cs, Sociale ontwikkelingen en milieukwaliteit, Een zoektocht naar sociale indicatoren voor de milieubalans, in: ROM-Magazine, nr.1-2, 2001, ISSN 1380-7153, pp. 6-9.

Coenen, F.H.J.M., Inspraak en kwaliteit besluitvorming Verkeer en Waterstaat, Fase 1 De evolutie van inspraak op het terrein van Verkeer en Waterstaat, rapport voor het Inspraakpunt Verkeer en Waterstaat.

Coenen, F.H.J.M., Inspraak en kwaliteit besluitvorming Verkeer en Waterstaat, Fase 3 Effectiviteit inspraak en de kwaliteit van besluitvorming, rapport voor het Inspraakpunt Verkeer en Waterstaat

Huitema, D., Nederland nooit veilig voor milieurampen, in: Interdisciplinair, 2001, no. 1, ISSN 1381-5229, pp. 27-29.

Matton, T.J. en S.J. Schuurman, Terreinwinst voor Bedrijvigheid: Duurzaamheid en de combinatie van Arbeid en Zorg op bedrijventerreinen, Leeuwarden: eQua, 2001, pp. 1-62.

Peppel, Rob van de, Verandering van spijs… , Een vernieuwde beleidswetenschappelijke inleiding op het milieubeleid, over P.P.J. Driessen en P. Glasbergen (red.), Milieu, samenleving en beleid, Den Haag: Elsevier, 2000, in: Binnenlands Bestuur, jrg. 22, 3 augustus 2001, pp. 77.

Peppel, Rob van de, De prijs van het politiek primaat, over Roel Nieuwkamp, De prijs van het politiek primaat, Wederzijds vertrouwen en loyaliteit in de verhouding tussen bewindspersonen en ambtelijk top, Delft: Eburon, 2001, in: Binnenlands Bestuur, jrg. 22, 2 november 2001, pp. 115.

Veer, Annika van der, en Marc Witbreuk, Prijsveranderingen: Zinvol of zinloos? De Reiziger 24, 2001, p. 16-17.

Other

Bressers, Hans, The Ecological State, guest lecture in Course ‘Environmental policy and natural resource management’ at the IDHEAP in Lausanne, Suisse, January 30, 2001

Bressers, Hans, Inleiding op ‘De toekomst van de veiligheid rond bedrijven’, Debat aan de markt’, Concordia, Enschede, 8 februari 2001

Bressers, Hans, Environmental policy research in Europe, keynote speech at the 15th anniversary of the Forschungsstelle für Umweltpolitik of the Free University of Berlin, April 23, 2001.

Bressers, Hans, Implementation of instruments for sustainable development, paper SusGov conference in Ronda, Spain, November 8-11, 2001, pp. 1-37.

Bruijn, Theo de, and Vicki Norberg-Bohm, Voluntary, Collaborative and Information-Based Policies: Lessons and Next Steps for Environmental and Energy Policy in the United States and Europe BCSIA Working Paper, Harvard University, 2001, pp. 1-64.

Bruijn, Theo de and Kris Lulofs, Promoting Environmental Management in Dutch SMEs: Policy Implementation in Networks, Paper presented at the workshop: Voluntary, Collaborative and Information-based Policies: Lessons and Next Steps for Environmental and Energy Policies in the USA and Europe. Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Cambridge, MA USA, May 10-11 2001

Bruijn, T.J.N.M. de, Industrial Transformation; Visions from the USA and Europe, presentation at the EPE Breakfast Meeting, Brussels June 12 2001.

Bruijn, Theo de, Europeanization and Environmental Policy Arrangements of the Member States The Concept of “Goodness of Fit” Paper presented at Europeanisation of Environmental Policy Workshop, 29th June - 1st July 2001, Cambridge, UK

Bruijn, Theo de, and Vicki Norberg-Bohm, Voluntary, Collaborative and Information-Based Policies: Lessons and Next Steps for Environmental and Energy Policy in the United States and Europe in: Towards Environmental Innovation Systems, proceedings of the International Conference 27-29 September 2001, Garmisch-Partenkirchen.

Bruijn, Theo de, Multilevel governance between the European Union and its member states: The Importance of Policy Style, paper presented at the 2001 Berlin conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change “Global Environmental Change and the Nation State”, Berlin, 7-8 December 2001.

Bruijn, T.J.N.M. de, Workshops tijdens Internationale milieuconferentie te Bangkok, projectverslag voor het Ministerie van VROM, Enschede: Centrum voor Schone Technologie en Milieubeleid, 2001, pp. 1-20.

Bruijn, T.J.N.M. de, Seminar on 9^th international Conference of the Greening of Industry Network, Project report for the European Commission / Regional Institute for Environmental Technology, Enschede: Center for Clean Technology and Environmental Policy, 2001, pp. 1-24.

Coenen, F.H.J.M., Explaining the potential role of LA21-processes as a participatory planning reform, Paper prepared for the July 2001 World Planning Schools Congress, Shanghai, China Abstract no. 2015, Track 2 Public participation, Urban Governance, and Public Policy 2A 4 Learning to participate.

Coenen, F.H.J.M., Explaining the potential role of LA21-processes as a participatory planning reform, Paper prepared for the European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR), Section 4 Environmental policy, Panel 4.2 Agenda 21. General conference University of Kent, 6-10 September 2001.

Coenen, F.H.J.M., The Role of Stakeholders in Changing Consumption and Production Patterns, paper prepared for the OECD seminar on “Improving Governance for Sustainable Development” session “The Role of the Civil Society OECD Paris, 22-23 November 2001.

Coenen, F.H.J.M., Participation and effectiveness at the juncture of local and regional governance, paper prepared for the symposium The region: Approaches for sustainable development, paper presented at ENSURE conference, December 6^th and 7^th2001, Trento, Italy.

Fuchs, Doris, Julian Roberts and Markus Zöckler, Property rights,natural resources and justice in a globalizing world, paper presented at the annual meeting of the Internationsl Studies Association, Chicago, February 21-25, 2001.

Fuchs, Doris, Globalization and sustainable consumption, paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Chicago, February 21-25, 2001.

Fuchs, Doris and David Reiman, Environmental governance in the EU, Workshop of the EU Studies Web Course Project, Atlanta, US, March 29-30, 2001.

Fuchs, Doris, the influence of globalization on sustainable consumption, paper presented at the meeting of the Junge Umweltpoliticologen, Berlin, Germany, May, 18-20, 2001.

Fuchs, Doris, and Maarten Arentsen, Green electricity in the market place: the policy challenge, paper presented at the ECPR conference, Canterbury, UK, September 6-9, 2001.

Fuchs, Doris and Sylvia Lorek, Priorities in energy efficiency: The consumtion side, paper presented at the conference ‘energy efficiency and consumer preferences – two sides of the same coin?’ Tannenfelde, Germany,October 24-26, 2001.

Fuchs, Doris, Global governance: Critical reflections on theory and practice, paper presented at the meeting of the Junge Umweltpoliticologen, freiburg, Germany, November 9-11, 2001.

Fuchs, Doris, and Sylvia Lorek, Sustainable consumption governance in a globalizing world, paper presented at the Berlin conference on Human dimensions of Global Environmental Change, Berlin, Germany, December 7-9, 2001.

Hofman, P.S., Innovation, Negotiation and Path Dependencies in Industry and Policy - Environmental and technology policy induced innovation in the Netherlands, Paper for the 9^th Greening of Industry Network Conference, Bangkok, 21-25 January 2001.

Hofman, P.S. and S. Koottatep, Comparing Pollution Prevention Projects in Asia and Europe: The Set up, Implementation and Effectiveness of Pollution Prevention projects in the Netherlands and Thailand, Paper for the 9^th Greening of Industry Network Conference, Bangkok, 21-25 January 2001.

Huijs, S.W.F., sustainability differs: The case of policy for ionised radiation and GMO in the Netherlands, paper presented at the ECPR Conference, Canterbury, UK, September 6-9, 2001.

Huijs, S.W.F., Boundary work is different: The case of policy for ionizing radiation and GMO in food in the Netherlands, paper presented at the 4S conference ‘Fashioning the future: Technology and visions of Progress’, Boston, US, November 1-4, 2001.

Huijs, S.W.F., A guideline for Uncertainty Scanning and Assessment, RIVM intern manual.

Huitema, D., The Regge: undoing the past. The management of a small rain river in the East of the Netherlands, Paper prepared for the EUWARENESS Workshop Amsterdam, September 19-21, pp. 1-52.

Huitema, D., Nurturing nature: how to make a lake and maintain it. The IJsselmeer case as an example of some modern dilemma's and tendencies in Dutch water management, Paper prepared for the EUWARENESS Workshop, Milan, 21-23 March 2001, pp. 1-65.

Woltjer, J., F.H.J.M. Coenen and R.A. van de Peppel, ‘Inspraak’ –an institutional and historical account of public participation in Dutch planning, paper presented at the 2001 World Planning Schools Congress, Shanghai, China.

Participation in International Research Groups

Urban Planning and Environment Association Europe (UPE).

UPE-Europe is a Europe-wide network of researchers and practitioners from fields such as planning, environmental science and urban design. UPE-Europe's objectives and mission are to foster dialogue on issues of urban environmental planning and help develop practical solutions. UPE-Europe's remit covers all aspects of urban environmental planning and related generic concepts, such as sustainable development, livability, environmental quality, equity, public participation, and policy effectiveness. As a Europe-wide network it is able to explore the validity of these concepts among the different countries it represents. Johan Woltjer (University of Twente) and Katie Williams (Oxford Brookes University) are the co-chairs. The network includes researchers from various countries, including Austria, Denmark, Germany, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Portugal, Sweden, Serbia, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom. UPE-Europe is the sister organisation of UPE-Global. Website: http://www.frw.rug.nl/upe/.

Network on participation and environment (Twente 20 network)

This network, co-ordinated by Frans Coenen and Dave Huitema from CSTM, studies public participation in environmental decision making. Participants are academics or practitioners interested in environmental participation, with disciplinary backgrounds in both political science and planning. The network was established in 1997 at the first meeting hosted by CSTM. The theme of this meeting was "Participation and the quality of environmental decision making", stressing the functional-analytic argument for participation. The two days of exchange in Twente resulted in a book published by Kluwer Academic Publishers from the Netherlands in 1998. A second meeting was held on the occasion of ten years anniversary of CSTM in Enschede (April 1999). The group is working on a new book, which will be published in the summer of 2002.

European Water Regimes and the Notion of a Sustainable Status (EUWARENESS)

In April 1999 Hans Bressers and Stefan Kuks of CSTM established the international research group EUWARENESS, which is a consortium with participation of research institutes in six European countries (The Netherlands, Belgium, France, Spain, Italy and Switzerland). With approved funding from the 5^th Program of the European Union (key action ‘Sustainable Management and Quality of Water’) the consortium is investigating rival uses of water systems and the sustainability of water resource regimes in this respect. Property rights and use rights related to water systems are analysed, the price these owners and users are paying, the distribution of rights among all interested parties involved, etcetera. The consortium is using methods for regime analysis in the field of natural resources. The project will discuss and help to implement the concept ‘good status of water’, as used in the European Framework for Community Action in the Field of Water Policy. The project will be completed in Spring 2002. More information on this project is available at www.euwareness.nl.

GIDO-network

GIDO stands for Joint initiative realisation sustainable development. The Dutch GIDO foundation was established in 1998 with the aim to give an impulse to sustainable development on the local level. Key words are sustainable, integral and the citizens central.

Partners in the GIDO foundation are local politicians, ministries, universities, banks, consultancy firms and NGOs. CSTM is a partner in the GIDO initiative and Frans Coenen is a member of the working group on content.

The Greening of Industry Network

The Greening of Industry Network (GIN) is an international partnership, focusing on issues of industrial transformation, and dedicated to building a sustainable society. GIN brings together researchers from various disciplines (Business Administration, Technology Studies, Public Administration, etc.) working on issues of industry and the environment, together with people from industry, governments and NGOs. One of the main activities of GIN is to develop annual themes for conferences and workshops. The aim of those meetings is to provide a platform for people with different backgrounds to exchange ideas and experiences and to develop new relationships, visions and practices for sustainability. Since 1991 GIN has engaged participants from more than 50 countries to respond to the challenge of sustainable development. Three offices coordinate the Network activities: at Clark University, USA; at Chulalongkorn University, Thailand; and at CSTM University of Twente (Dr. Theo de Bruijn and Drs. Ellis Immerzeel-Brand). Below we highlight the main activities in 2001.

2001 Conference in Bangkok

In 2001 the 9th International Conference of the network took place in Bangkok, Thailand (January 21-25, 2001). Its central theme was “Sustainability at the Millenium – Globalization, Competitiveness, and the Public Thrust”. Over 350 participants attended the conference. Dr. Supachai Panichapakdi, Director-General Designate of WTO, acted as honorary chairman of the conference. The opening keynote was given by the Dutch Environmental Minister Jan Pronk. Other plenary speakers included H.E. Minister Korn Dabbaransi (Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Public Health, Thailand), H.E. Mr. Richard Hecklinger (U.S. Ambassador to Thailand), prof. Pier Vellinga (IVM VU Amsterdam) and dr. Jerry Rogers (General Motors, U.S.A.). During the parallel sessions some 150 speakers presented current findings and insights. From CSTM prof. Hans Bressers, dr. Theo de Bruijn, drs. Peter Hofman and drs. Ellis Immerzeel participated in the conference. The European office of GIN attracted funding for the conference from the Dutch Ministry of VROM and from the European Commission.

2002 Conference

The preparations for the 10th International Conference (Corporate Social Responsibility - Governance for Sustainability, June 23-26, 2002, Gothenburg, Sweden) were continued during 2001. A Call for Papers has been published. As a result almost 300 proposals came in.

Launch of the second decade of GIN

At the inaugural meeting of the Greening of Industry Network in 1991, the network was established as a ten-year program of meetings, publications and communications. In 2000 the achievements at the ten-year mark were evaluated. At the 9^th International Conference in Bangkok the Second Decade of the Greening of Industry Network has been launched officially. A (renewed) International Planning Board has been formed in 2001. Other changes within GIN are the establishment of a formal membership structure, to be launched in 2002.

Publications

Early 2001 a new volume in the GIN Book Series has been published: Ken Green, Peter Groenewegen and Peter Hofman (eds.), Ahead of the Curve: Cases of Innovation in Environmental Management, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001.

Responses to Uncertainty in Environmental Policy

In this network, scholars from the United States (Universities of Florida and Georgia), Germany (Free University of Berlin) and CSTM (Maarten Arentsen, Hans Bressers and Larry O’Toole) debate the way in which environmental policy making is influenced by the accumulation of uncertainties that characterise the sources of and possible remedies to sustainability issues and the modes of governance that seem most fit to handle these. In November 1997, an “Expert Meeting”, supported by the Dutch national science foundation (NWO) fund for the internationalisation of the social sciences, under the title “The role of uncertainty issues in environmental governance” was organised at CSTM. The collection of papers has been published in Policy Studies Journal in 2000. In 2000 the group had a workshop meeting in Florida on the theme ‘Politics of sustainable development: Institutions across scales’. The presented workshop papers are currently processed into a joint book to be published in 2002.

Reform

The Reform Network, established in 1993, unites academics from Norway, United Kingdom, Germany, France and the Netherlands (CSTM, Maarten Arentsen and Delft University, Rolf Künneke), jointly conducting research on the emerging reform of the electricity and gas industry in Europe. The network comparatively studies industrial transformation processes as well as their impact on the economic and environmental performance of the energy industry. The primary focus of the network is theoretical with a strong emphasis on empirical research. The network meets several times a year for working on joint themes and projects. Occasionally, the network organizes international conferences in Salzburg Austria, to debate research findings and to exchange ideas with representatives from public agencies and industry. Reform presently prepares two books, one on markets, regulations and business strategies in the European energy industry and one on the liberalization of the European gas market.

The European Network for Sustainable Urban and Regional Development Research (ENSURE)

ENSURE is an international network of persons and institutions that are committed to the advance of sustainable urban and regional development research scientific field. The Network has the goal of strengthening sustainable regional development research, especially in the European context and to establish it as a major driving force in the transition process initiated by the AGENDA 21. It pursues this goal by:

-	bringing together scientists of different backgrounds that are active or interested in the field of sustainable regional development research;

-	initiating trans-national co-operation between different scientists as well as politicians, administrators and businessmen in sustainable regional development projects and programs;

-	informing its members on important facts, trends and chances in relation to sustainable regional development;

-	providing political and administrative decision makers at the international and European level with first rate information about ongoing research activities in this scientific field.

The CSTM is the national ENSURE focal point and Frans Coenen is a member of the ENSURE advisory board.

Environmental post graduate program

‘Master of Environmental and Energy Management’

In co-operation with its subsidiary Cartesius, and the Technology and Development Group of the University of Twente, CSTM started an International Masters Program ‘environmental and Energy Management’ in September 2000.

The initial success of the program continued in 2001 with 29 students from Asia, Africa and South America. Participants are trained in the technology, organisation and politics of environmental and energy management. Graduates find their way as environmental and energy experts in industrial and governmental organisations and NGOs. The historic and former university city Franeker hosts the master program.

More information concerning the master program can be found on www.utwente.nl/cstm or at www.sms.utwente.nl and go to Technology and Development Group.

CSTM graduate and

post-graduate teaching activities

Maarten Arentsen

History of Dutch energy supply (SWOT)

Markets fornatural gas (WB)

Hans Bressers

Methods and techniques of Policy Analysis (BSK)

Guest Lecture at IDHEAP Lausanne, Switserland

Environmental Policy (BSK and Erasmus program)

Environmental Policy (Master of Environmental and Energy Management)

Theo de Bruijn

Environmental Management (BSK)

Environmental Management (Master of Environmental and Energy Management)

MBA Course Clark University, Graduate School of Management, Global Business Seminar, Boston, USA

Frans Coenen

Environmental Policy (Master of Environmental and Energy Management)

Valentina Dinica

Environmental Policy (Erasmus program)

Environmental Policy (Master of Environmental and Energy Management)

Environmental Policy (Summerschool TDG)

Dick Hoek

‘Beleidsinstrumenten bij de casus verf’ (werkcollege RUG)

Peter Hofman

Environmental Advisory Projects I, II, (Master of Environmental and Energy Management)

Pollution Control Strategies in Different Settings (Master of Environmental and Energy Management)

Simône Huijs

Ontwerpen van beleid, projectbegeleiding (BSK)

Inleiding Beleidswetenschappen, werkcollege (BSK)

Stefan Kuks

Water Management and Environmental Policy (CT&M)

Watermanagement in the Netherlands (BSK)

Market forces in the water sector (Delft University, post-initial course on Watermanangement in the 21^st Century)

Kris Lulofs

Environmental Management (BSK, T&M)

Environmental Management (Master of Environmental and Energy Management)

Theo Matton

Environment and Technology (CT, Master of Environmental and Energy Management)

Sustainable water- and energy supply (project supervision) (CT, Environmental Technology)

Environmental Advisory projects (design en support via Teletop)

Geerten Schrama

Environmental Business Strategy (CT)

Johan Woltjer

Guestlecture “Communicative Planning” (RUG)

Scientific and

professional activities of CSTM staff

Maarten Arentsen

Managing Director CSTM

University representative ICM-VSNU

Hans Bressers

Scientific Director CSTM

Advisory Committee Implementation Municipal Environmental Policy (chair)

Board of Editors Beleidswetenschap (member)

Board of Editors Milieu (member)

Commission Sustainable Development (DUO) Dutch ‘Social Economic Council’ (member)

Scientific advisory committee National Strategy for Sustainable Development (member)

Theo de Bruijn

Greening of Industry Network (European coordinator and member Conference Program Committee 2002)

Editorial Board Business Strategy and the Environment (member)

Editorial Board book-series Eco-efficiency in Industry and Science (member)

Frans Coenen

GIDO Foundation (member taskforce)

Twente Twenty Network on Participation and Environment (coordinator)

Board of SWOME (Dutch network of social scientist researchers in environmental policy, member)

Advisory board of ENSURE (network on regional sustainable development, member)

Editorial Advisory board ‘Local Environment’ (member)

Peter Hofman

Greening of Industry Network (member of the planning board)

Stefan Kuks

Project coordinator EU-funded research project EUWARENESS (European Water Regimes and the Notion of a Sustainable Status)

Waterboard Regge and Dinkel (elected member Executive Committee, chairman of the Committee Treasury and Economic Affairs)

Provincial Committee for Rural Planning in the area south of Enschede (appointed member)

William M. Lafferty

Evaluation Panel for Marie Curie Fellowship, European Commission, Research Directorate (member)

Member of an International Evaluation Commission for the Swedish research programme on “Ways Forward: Paths to Sustainable Development”

Appointment to the Executive Committee of European Network for Sustainable Urban and Regional Development Research (ENSURE)

Appointment to the International Advisory Board of the academic journal: “INNOVATION: The Journal of European Social Science Research”

Appointment to the editorial board of the International Political Science Review

Member of the National Committee on “environmental Visions, 2030”, Norwegians Research Council.

Kris Lulofs

European Consortium of Innovative Universities, Portfolio Research Environmental Science

Larry O’Toole

Executive Council, US National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration (member)

International Education Committee, US National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration (member)

Site Visit Team for program review at another university, US National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration (chair)

Founding Member, Board of Directors, Public Management review

Member of Editorial Boards of:

Administration and Society

Administrative Theory and Praxis

Beleidswetenschap

Evaluation and Program Planning

Journal of Public Affairs Education

University of Georgia Press

Additional reviewer for:

American Review of Public Administration

Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory
Journal of the American Water Resources Association

Policy Studies Journal

Public Administration Review

Rationality and Society

Congressional Quarterly Press

Rob van de Peppel

Editorial Board Beleidswetenschap (secretary)

Johan Woltjer

Association of European Schools of Planning AESOP (associate-member)

Urban Planning and Environment Association Europe UPE (co-chair)

Congress Participation

(Inter)national conferences outside the Netherlands:

9^th International Conference of the Greening of Industry Network “Sustainability at the Millenium: Globabilization, competitiveness, and the Public Trust”, Bangkok, January 21-24 2001

Theo de Bruijn co-organizer, papergiver, chair, speaker

Hans Bressers papergiver

Peter Hofman papergiver (2)

Co-ordinators Meeting for the FP5 Projects in the Key Action Water, Meeting organised by the European Commission, Brussels, March 1-2, 2001

Stefan Kuks presenter

International project meeting ‘European Water Regimes and the Notion of a Sustainable Status (Euwareness)’, Milano-Italy, March 21-23, 2001

Hans Bressers discussant

Dave Huitema papergiver

Stefan Kuks chairman

Envinno Meeting, March 31-April 1, Institut für Wirtschaftsgeographie, Regionalentwicklung und Umweltwirtschaft, Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien, Vienna, Austria

Peter Hofman participant

International workshop “Environment Oriented Innovation - a Challenge for Politics and Businesses", April 2, Vienna, Austria

Peter Hofman poster presentation

Voluntary, Collaborative and Information-based Policies: Lessons and Next Steps for Environmental and Energy Policies in the USA and Europe. Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Cambridge, MA USA, May 10-11 2001

Theo de Bruijn co-organizer, papergiver, chair

Kris Lulofs papergiver, discussant

Geerten Schrama papergiver

Tenth Anniversary Celebration, Centre for Development and the Environment, University of Oslo, May, 2001.

William Lafferty designated speaker

Workshop on “The global ecological crisis and the nation state: Sovereignty, Economy and Ecology”ECPR Joint sessions of Workshops, Grenoble, France, June 6-11, 2001

William Lafferty paper presenter

The ‘International Think Tank in preparation for the World Summit on sustainable Development (WSSD), Johannesburg 2002, The International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI), Stavanger, Norway, 9-11 June 2001

William Lafferty Designated European academic representative

"Green Electricity in the Netherlands" June 7^th, Oslo, Norway:

Valentina Dinica papergiver (with Maarten Arentsen)

EPE Breakfast Meeting, Brussels June 12 2001

Theo de Bruijn speaker

Sustianable development- Forum for partnership, 27-29 June 2001 Malmo, Sweden. Frans Coenen speaker

Europeanisation of Environmental Policy Workshop, 29th June - 1st July 2001, Cambridge, UK

Theo de Bruijn papergiver

Reform workshop on Regulation Markets and Business Strategies in Europe, University of Porto, Porto 6-7 July 2001

Maarten Arentsen presentation

Agenda 21 in der Euregio, Austausch und Perspektiven fur euregionale Zusammenarbeit, 22 August 2001 in Gronau, co-organiser INTERREG, Epe (Gronau)

Frans Coenen organizer

European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR), General conference Section 4 Environmental policy, Panel 4.2 Agenda 21. University of Kent, 6-10 September 2001 Frans Coenen papergiver

Simône Huijs papergiver

Kalundborg Roundtable “Eco-Industrial Networking: Problems and Possibilities” (Denmark) September 2001

Theo Matton discussant

International Summer School on Economics, Innovation, Technological Progress and Environmental Policy, Seeon Monastry, Germany, 8-12 September 2001

Valentina Dinica papergiver and presentation

Towards Environmental Innovation Systems, proceedings of the International Conference 27-29 September 2001, Garmisch-Partenkirchen

Theo de Bruijn papergiver, discussant

Norwegian National Conference “Synergi 21” arranged by the Ministry of the Environment and the Norwegian Association of Local and Regional Authorities, Stavanger, Norway, October 17-19, 2001

William Lafferty keynote speaker

Frans Coenen speaker

Conference on Energy Efficiency in Liberalised Energy Markets, Tannenfelde, Germany, October 24-26, 2001

Maarten Arentsen presentation

Reform workshop on Regulation Markets and Business Strategies in Europe, Tannenfelde, Germany October 26-28, 2001

Maarten Arentsen presentation

4-S Conference “Fashioning the Future: Science, technology and Visions of Progress”, 1-4 November 2001, Boston, USA

Simône Huijs paper presenter

Research workshop “Implementing Sustainable Development” orgsanized by ProSus, University of Oslo, in Rondo, Spain, November 8-11, 2001

Hans Bressers papergiver, presentation, discussant

Larry O’Toole paper presenter

The 3^rd Annual Renewables Energy Summit, Brussels, Hotel Le Meridien, 21-22 November 2001

Valentina Dinica discussant

OECD seminar on “Improving Governance for Sustainable Development” session “The Role of the Civil Society OECD Paris, 22-23 November 2001

Frans Coenen panel member, papergiver

OECD expert Seminar on ‘Improving Governance for Sustainable Development”, Paris, 22-23 November, 2001.

William Lafferty presentation of keynote paper and panel participation

Corporate Social Responsibility on the European Social Policy Agenda. Conference of the Belgian Presidency of the European Union. 27-28 November 2001, Brussels.

Geerten Schrama participant

ENSURE-symposium ‘The region: Approaches for sustainable development’, December 6^th and 7^th2001, Trento, Italy

Frans Coenen papergiver

2001 Berlin conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change “Global Environmental Change and the Nation State”, Berlin, 7-8 December 2001.

Theo de Bruijn papergiver

1^st World Planning Schools Congress, Shanghai, China

Frans Coenen papergiver

Johan Woltjer papergiver

(Inter)national conferences in the Netherlands:

GIDO-annual conference ‘DUURZAAM-Samen-doen’, 18 januari 2001

Frans Coenen session chair

‘De toekomst van de veiligheid rond bedrijven’, “Debat aan de markt”, Concordia, Enschede, 8 februari 2001

Hans Bressers presentation and chair

Workshop Technological Transitions and Scenario Building, February 28, Ministry of VROM, The Hague

Peter Hofman presentation

Workshop ‘Participatie in lokale duurzame ontwikkeling/Neue wegen in die Burgerbeteiligung in Lokale Nachhaltiger Entwicklung, 16 maart 2001, Universiteit Twente, INTERREG-II porject LA21 in de Euregio

Frans Coenen organisor

ProSus preparatory research conference at CSTM, May 8, 2001

Hans Bressers discussant, co-host

Workshop Management of Technology Responses to the Climate Change Challenge, Enschede 16 May 2001

Maarten Arentsen organisor, presentation

Peter Hofman presentation

Symposium Joule Unlimited, Solutions in Sustainable Energy Development, Enschede, June 7, 2001

Peter Hofman participant

Presentation of research results ‘Duurzame bedrijventerreinen en de Combinatie van Arbeid en Zorg’. Kamer van Koophandel, Friesland. Juni 2001

Theo Matton invited speaker

Workshop ‘Milieumonitoring: een effectief beleidsinsturment?’ Arnhem, KLV Milieu, 28 juni 2001

Dick Hoek participant

International project meeting ‘European Water Regimes and the Notion of a Sustainable Status (Euwareness)’, Amsterdam-Netherlands, September 19-21, 2001

Stefan Kuks chairman

Hans Bressers discussant

Dave Huitema papergiver

'Bestuurskunde en de kunst van het probleemoplossen', lustrumcongres Faculteit Bestuurskunde, Universiteit Twente, oktober 2001

Dave Huitema co-organiser

Workshop ‘Ruimtelijke oplossingen voor Arbeid en Zorg’ in Steenwijk. Oktober 2001

Theo Matton invited speaker

Wokshop ‘Duurzame technologie in de regionale markt’, 3 oktober 2001, Utrecht.

Geerten Schrama keynote speaker

National Conference on Climate Change, 14 november 2001, Noordwijkerhout

Maarten Arentsen presentation

Frans Coenen presentation

RIS+ Innovation Conference. Provincie Overijssel. 15 november 2001, Zwolle.

Geerten Schrama participant

ECN symposium ‘Marges voor verduurzaming van de Nederlandse energievoorziening binnen de Europese beleidsruimte’, Amsterdam, 23 november 2001

Peter Hofman participant

Workshop ‘Ethisch beleggen’, ASN Bank. 30 november 2001, Amsterdam.

Geerten Schrama participant

Megacorridors in North West Europe: Key Issues and Transnational Perspectives; ‘Corridesign Conference’, The Hague, The Netherlands, 2001.

Johan Woltjer discussant