Steven Dorrestijn
|
Steven Dorrestijn MA Department of Philosophy University of Twente P.O. Box 217 7500 AE Enschede Netherlands |
visiting address: Cubicus, room B221 telephone: +31 53 4894811 email: s.dorrestijn@utwente.nl |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Background |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
My interests and education are in product design and in philosophy. I completed a two-year program in mechanical engineering and courses on the history of design. I graduated in Philosophy of Science, Technology and Society at the University of Twente in 2004. In 2005-2006 I studied philosophy in Paris with the support of a grant from the French government. In May 2007 I started a PhD research on Product Impact – Technical mediation in philosophy and design. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PhD Research: Product ImpactThe research project I participate in is in the domain of Industrial Design and is called Design for Usability. It is supported by the Innovation-Oriented Research Programme ‘Integrated Product Creation and Realization (IOP IPCR)’ of the Netherlands Ministry of Economic Affairs. My research will focus on Product impact and will contribute to the overall project with a view from philosophy and ethics of technology. The project focuses on the impact that technical products have on user behaviour. Design practices would greatly improve if they could anticipate this influence. In order to realize this, the project focuses on (1) elaborating a framework to anticipate product influences on user practices; (2) translating this framework to the practice of design; and (3) systematically addressing ethical questions resulting from the explicit design of behaviour-steering products Supervisors: Prof.dr.ir. Peter-Paul Verbeek and Prof.dr. H.J. Achterhuis. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Teaching
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Themes
Technical mediation and subjectivation: The transformation of ourselves through technology |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The topics of product design and philosophy were surprisingly brought together in an advertising slogan by IKEA: “Design your own life”. The slogan is fascinating because it expresses how design and human life merge. You design your life by gathering furniture, utensils and gadgets around you. To be sure, IKEA products may not necessarily give your own life a very unique form, nor is it likely that the company intends to promote advanced philosophical ideas. Still, there is a philosophical sense to the slogan, expressing that the use of technical products transforms our way of living and shapes our mode of being. Human existence has in many ways become technically mediated. In the case of furniture we tend to take this for granted without much consideration. In other cases, however, like for example emergent e-paying systems in public transport, there is a lot of worry about privacy, tracking and control. Therefore, a need exists for awareness and understanding of the life transforming power of technology. Coping with the influences of technology is an important task and a challenge for contemporary politics as well as for design theory and practice. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For theoretical elaboration of this theme I find particularly helpful the research on the subject by Michel Foucault (French philosopher, 1926-1984). There is an important shift of perspective in Foucault’s work. First Foucault stressed how people’s lives have become more and more governed and fashioned by the growing network of institutions, regulations, and technology. Later he complemented his earlier approach by investigating how people govern and fashion themselves by actively coping with the influences from this network. Foucault has thus developed notions of the subject, freedom, and ethics which are highly relevant for ethics in contemporary technological culture. At stake in this approach is not so much to retain human freedom by rejecting any technical constraints, but to shape and to practice concrete forms of freedom by deliberate design of constraints. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publications
In Dutch
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||





